<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: C++ code metrics with cccc</title>
	<link>http://cysquatch.net/blog/2007/07/10/c-code-metrics-with-cccc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 May 2012 11:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://cysquatch.net/blog/2007/07/10/c-code-metrics-with-cccc/#comment-15</link>
		<author>matt</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cysquatch.net/blog/2007/07/10/c-code-metrics-with-cccc/#comment-15</guid>
					<description>I find it somewhat interesting that cccc is still the best tool around for this stuff, since it is what I used as part of my Hons thesis 10 (eep!) years ago.

Maybe the idea of metrics like this are only popular among people that read certain Software Engineering textbooks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it somewhat interesting that cccc is still the best tool around for this stuff, since it is what I used as part of my Hons thesis 10 (eep!) years ago.</p>
<p>Maybe the idea of metrics like this are only popular among people that read certain Software Engineering textbooks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carl</title>
		<link>http://cysquatch.net/blog/2007/07/10/c-code-metrics-with-cccc/#comment-16</link>
		<author>Carl</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jul 2007 23:45:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://cysquatch.net/blog/2007/07/10/c-code-metrics-with-cccc/#comment-16</guid>
					<description>There are better tools available, but you have to pay for them.

But yeah, code metrics still seem fairly niche. This may be because determining which parts of an application are crap is pretty easy (in fact it's usually painfully obvious), the problem is finding the time to fix the crappy parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are better tools available, but you have to pay for them.</p>
<p>But yeah, code metrics still seem fairly niche. This may be because determining which parts of an application are crap is pretty easy (in fact it&#8217;s usually painfully obvious), the problem is finding the time to fix the crappy parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

