Bugtracking Lore

James over at Code Lore has a post up with some good tips on using bug trackers. This is great news because I have been planning to write a very similar post but have not gotten around to it. Prior to my departure from my previous employer, James was the Program Manager for the product I was working on. There were a few things we were doing that were kinda cool (or at least new to me) and worth blogging about.

First off, I don’t like calling them “bug trackers”. I prefer “issue tracker”. Everything should go in the issue tracker. This is how our team worked at Sensory and I thought it was great. New features, bugs, and any other tasks that have to be done- including things that will not result in code modifications- are all added to the issue tracker.

Having everything recorded in one place is vastly preferable to other methods that I’ve used- say where bugs are in the bug tracker but new features are “tracked” in a Word document lying around on a shared drive in a folder that’s rarely touched except by the guy who updates the document on the odd occasion when he’s had enough coding for the day. Such techniques are variously referred to as “lightweight” and “totally lame”.

And some random comments on what James wrote:

Logging - i.e., using the “comment” feature of the bug tracker to keep track of progress (or lack thereof). Yes. Yes. Yes.

Bug Triage - I didn’t do any of this since I was a mere developer, but I was present when James was on some of his bug triage rampages. They were brutal.

Scheduling - that is, keeping track of the estimated and actual amount of time spent working on an issue. I was quite skeptical when we started doing this, as I thought is would be too much work and too inaccurate to be very worthwhile. Most developer’s days are filled with many different activities, some done concurrently, so it’s often difficult to know how to allocate time to different issues.

I eventually realized that these numbers do not need atomic clock precision to be very useful. I use and recommend Joel Spolsky’s method for working out what time went where:

You do not really have to watch your stopwatch while you code. Right before you go home, or go to sleep under the desk if you’re one of those geeks, pretend you’ve worked for 8 hours (ha!), figure out which tasks you’ve worked on, and sprinkle about 8 hours in the elapsed column accordingly.

Joel is talking about using Excel for scheduling, but the advice applies just as well when using an issue tracker.

James also discussed integrating an issue tracker with a version control system, and I’ve got another rant about that in the pipeline.

Redhat summit roundup

Chris Blizzard has a very useful post up summarizing the announcements made at the recent Redhat Summit. I’ve been following this but still missed some cool stuff like Redhat Exchange.

The basic idea behind RH Exchange seems to be that you download RHEL with third-party applications already installed and ready to go. I notice that Alfresco are already a partner; this is interesting since a colleague of mine just spent a couple of days trying to get Alfresco up and running on Fedora Core 6. Alfresco uses OpenOffice for document format conversions, and Oo was the component that put up the most resistance during the installation process. I think it would have been better to just give Redhat money and avoid the hassle.

No doubt there are very good reasons for it, but it’s mildly amusing that Redhat are going to write some Windows drivers to take advantage of RHEL’s paravirtualization features. Hopefully the guys writing these won’t get teased too much by the other Redhat developers.

Howling Bells at the Metro

On Friday night I took De to see the Howling Bells at the Metro . I’m not familiar with their stuff but it was a great show. The Metro was pretty much full and the crowd gave them a very warm response.

In a previous life (prior to 2004, I think) Howling Bells were known as Waikiki. I saw them under this name at Newtown RSL back in 1999 or 2000, when I was working as the in-house sound engineer. I’ll admit I don’t remember them that well, but I remember well enough to know they’ve come a long way since then. The Bells have done a lot of touring over the last couple of years with some big names (including The Killers and Placebo) and it really shows in the quality of their performance. I will be picking up the album for sure.

The Metro itself was also in fine form on the night. Back in the days when I used to go more often, it had a battered old Martin Audio system which had probably been deafening punters since the early eighties. It sounded passable on good nights. These days it’s a Nexo Alpha system, a vast improvement. Kudos to the Bells’ front of house engineer as the gig was a pleasure to listen to.

If you are after a more comprehensive review of the night check out this one by Chock.